Heroes and generals hacks november 201512/19/2023 ![]() ![]() Have we done a good enough job vetting everyone? Are we on top of it?”īiderman’s response was dated 17 June 2015. An insider data breach would be very harmful. One was a summary of results of an internal questionnaire, in which employees were asked to list “critical success factors” in their jobs, the areas where “failure to perform well” would hurt them most, and the area where they would “hate to see something go wrong”.īiderman, the company’s chief executive, wrote in the section on what he would hate to see go wrong: “Data exfiltration, confidentiality of the data. The leaked internal documents show one company vice-president raising concerns over “a lack of security awareness across the organisation”. “The criminal, or criminals, involved in this act have appointed themselves as the moral judge, juror, and executioner, seeing fit to impose a personal notion of virtue on all of society.”Ī second database leaked by the hackers also demonstrated that senior staff at the site were raising concerns over its security procedures as recently as June. It is an illegal action against the individual members of, as well as any freethinking people who choose to engage in fully lawful online activities,” Avid Life Media said in a statement. “This event is not an act of ‘hacktivism’, it is an act of criminality. Its owner, Toronto-based Avid Life Media, said it was working with police and law-enforcement authorities in Canada and the US. The group that attacked the company said it was motivated by the fact that the full-delete option generated $1.7m (£1.1m) in revenue in 2014.Īshley Madison was set up in 2001 by a Canadian entrepreneur, Noel Biderman, and courted controversy with its explicitly pro-infidelity stance. The allegations that Ashley Madison’s full delete did not work as advertised are at the heart of the stated motivation for the site’s hack, which is thought to have taken place last month. The company apparently retained the date of birth, city, state, postcode, country and gender of its former customers, plus information about their relationship status, what they were open to sexually, and what they were looking for in a partner. The leaked data included enough information to enable the easy identification of users. The leak also appeared to demonstrate that the “full delete” service run by Ashley Madison, which purported to charge users £15 to remove all their information from the dating site, did not work comprehensively. “I am not aware of, or in contact with … Ashley Madison, and look forward to finding out more about what has actually happened,” she said. Michelle Thomson, the MP for Edinburgh West, said her identity was “harvested” by hackers. A married SNP MP whose email address was among the millions released said she was the victim of a smear campaign.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |